Search 

Azcourts.gov

Arizona Judicial Branch

Agendas and Cases before the Court

 

 
NOTE:  Cases are listed until the issuance of the Court's mandate. 
 
 
BSI HOLDINGS LLC v ADOT 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-17-0241-PR 
Opinion issued on 5/24/2018 
Oral Argument held on 2/21/2018
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 12/11/2017 
Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-TX 16-0003 
 
LISA FRIEDMAN v DAVID C ROELS JR et al 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-17-0225-PR 
Oral Argument held on 4/16/2018 

Case Summary

Petition for Review granted on 2/13/2018 
Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division One, 2 CA-CV 16-0029 
 
DIANA GLAZER v STATE 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-17-0229-PR 
Oral Argument held on 1/23/2018
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 12/11/2017 
Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CV 16-0416 
 
HOPI TRIBE v ARIZONA SNOWBALL RESORT et al 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-18-0057-PR 
Oral Argument not yet scheduled 
Case Summary not yet available 
Petition for Review granted on 5/8/2018 
Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CV 16-0521 
 
THOMAS KOPP et al v PHYSICIAN GROUP OF AZ et al 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-17-0222-PR 
Oral Argument held on 5/15/2018
Case Summary 
Petition for Review granted on 3/20/2018 
Memorandum Decision issued from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case Nos. 1 CA-CV 16-0227, 1 CA-CV 16-0228, 1 CA-CV 16-0232 
 
MERTOLA LLC v ALBERTO J SANTOS/ARLENE SANTOS 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-17-0109-PR 
Oral Argument held on 11/7/2017
Case Summary 
Petition for Review granted on 9/12/2017 
Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CV 16-0168 
 
SUSAN RYAN v NAPIER/KLEIN 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-17-0325-PR 
Oral Argument to be held on 5/17/2018
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on the following issues as reframed by the Court on 3/20/2018:  1, 2, and 3, and issue 4 reframed as, if Deputy Klein was entitled to assert a justification defense, did the trial court commit reversible error in instructing the jury that the Deputy bore the burden of proof under A.R.S.§13-409? 
Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2 CA-CV 16-0155 
 
ALMA S. v DCS/J.R./I.R. 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-17-0363-PR 
Oral Argument to be held on 6/5/2018 
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 5/8/2018 
Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-JV 16-0497 
 
ROBIN SILVER et al v PUEBLO DEL SOL WATER CO et al 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-16-0294-PR 
Oral Argument held on 3/8/2018
Case Summary

Petitions for Review granted on the following issues on 12/11/2017:   

 1. Whether the court of appeals erred to the extent it requires ADWR on remand to consider BLM’s federal reserved water rights under ADWR’s regulation governing the physical availability of a groundwater supply, A.A.C 12-15-716(B).

 2. Whether, under A.R.S. section 45-108, ADWR may designate Pueblo’s watersupply as adequate without evaluating potential legal conflicts between Pueblo’s groundwater pumping and BLM’s senior federal reserved water rights that could render Pueblo’s water supply legally unavailable, solely because those water rights have not been adjudicated.

 3. Whether the private attorney general doctrine is applicable and permits anaward of fees against Pueblo. 

Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, No. 1 CA-CV 14-0811 
 
STATE v JOHN MICHAEL ALLEN 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-17-0556-AP 
Oral Argument not yet scheduled 
Case Summary not yet available  
 
STATE v SAMMANTHA LUCILLE REBECCA ALLEN 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-17-0368-AP 
Oral Argument not yet scheduled 
Case Summary not yet available  
 
STATE v JASON EUGENE BUSH 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-11-0107-AP 
Oral Argument to be held on 6/5/2018
Case Summary
 
STATE v ALAN MATTHEW CHAMPAGNE 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-17-0425-AP 
Oral Argument not yet scheduled 
Case Summary not yet available  
 
STATE v ERICK ANTONIO ESCALANTE 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-17-0251-PR 
Oral Argument to be held on 5/17/2018
Case Summary 
Petition for Review granted on 3/20/2018 
Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CR 15-0684 
 
STATE v HON. WEIN/HENDERSON/GOODMAN 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-17-0221-PR 
Opinion issued on 5/25/2018 
Oral Argument held on 2/22/2018 
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 1/9/2018 
Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case Nos. 1 CA-SA 17-0072 and 1 CA-SA 17-0077 
 
STATE v CHARLES MICHAEL HEDLUND 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-93-0377-AP 
Oral Argument not yet scheduled 
Case Summary not yet available  
 
STATE v ANTHONY LITO HERNANDEZ 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-17-0325-PR 
Opinion issued on 5/18/2018 
Oral Argument held on 12/12/2017 
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 11/16/2017 
Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2 CA-CR 15-0229 
 
STATE v JAMES CLAYTON JOHNSON 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-16-0261-AP 
Oral Argument not yet scheduled 
Case Summary not yet available  
 
STATE v ANDRE LEE JUWAUN MAESTAS 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-17-0193-PR 
Opinion issued on 5/23/2018 
Oral Argument held on 2/22/2018
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 1/9/2018 
Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CR 15-0724 
 
STATE v JAMES ERIN McKINNEY 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-93-0362-AP 
Oral Argument not yet scheduled 
Case Summary not yet available  
 
STATE v SOPHIA LEEANN RICHTER 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-17-0452-PR 
Oral Argument held on 5/15/2018
Case Summary 

Petition for Review granted on the following issues as reframed by the Court on 3/20/2018: 

1. Whether the court of appeals properly applied the “observation evidence” exception in Clark v. Arizona, 548 U.S. 735 (2006), in the context of a duress defense, and 2. Whether an abuser’s constant threats of harm over a three-month period can constitute the “threat or use of immediate physical force” under A.R.S. §13-412(A) sufficient to permit the defendant to raise a duress defense to her allegedly ongoing abuse of her children. 
Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2 CA-CR 16-0141 
 
STATE v THOMAS MICHAEL RILEY 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-15-0411-AP
Oral Argument not yet scheduled
Case Summary not yet available 
 
STATE v JASPER PHILLIP RUSHING 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-15-0268-AP 
Opinion issued on 11/6/2017 
Oral Argument held on 9/13/2017
Case Summary
 
STATE v DAUNTORIAN LYDEL SANDERS 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-14-0302-AP 
Oral Argument to be held on 6/6/2018
Case Summary 
 
STATE v PRESTON ALTON STRONG 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-17-0201-AP 
Oral Argument not yet scheduled 
Case Summary not yet available 
 
STATE v FRANCISCO MIGUEL URREA 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-17-0261-PR 
Oral Argument held on 4/16/2018
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 2/13/2018 
Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, No. 2 CA-CR 15-0416 
 
STATE v JOSE ALEJANDRO ACUNA VALENZUELA
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-14-0351-AP 
Oral Argument to be held on 6/6/2018
Case Summary
 
DENNIS TEUFEL v AMERICAN FAMILY/KERRY HANSON 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-17-0190-PR 
Oral Argument held on 4/2/2018
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 2/13/2018 
Memorandum Decision issued from the Court of Appeals, Division One, 1 CA-CV 15-0736 
 
TURTLE ROCK III v LYNNE A FISHER 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-17-0339-PR 
Oral Argument not yet scheduled 
Case Summary not yet available 
Petitioner for Review granted on the following reframed issues on 5/8/2018:  Are ad hoc penalties per se unreasonable under ARS 33-1803(B)?  If ad hoc penalties are permissible, are they unreasonable if they are not based on actual damages to the homeowner association? 
Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CV 16-0455 
 
TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v GRACIELA LEIJA 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-17-0280-PR 
Oral Argument held on 5/8/2018
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 3/20/2018 
Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CV 16-0174 
 
 
NOTE:  Cases are listed until the issuance of the Court's mandate.
 
 
Notice: While the clerk's office maintains quality control measures on the information posted, some errors may occur. All posted information is subject to change or amendment.